ສຶກສາປັດໄຈທີ່ມີຜົນຕໍ່ຄວາມສາມາດດ້ານວິຊາການຂອງບຸກຄະລາກອນໃນມະຫາວິທະຍາໄລ ແຫ່ງຊາດ
The Study of Factor Affecting Academic Capability of Personnel at The National University of Laos
Keywords:
ຄຳສຳຄັນ: ຄວາມສາມາດດ້ານວິຊາການ; ບຸກຄະລາກອນ; ແບບຈໍາລອງ Tobit.Abstract
ບົດຄັດຫຍໍ້
ບົດຄົ້ນຄວ້ານີ້ແມ່ນມີຈຸດປະສົງເພື່ອສຶກສາປັດໄຈທີ່ມີຜົນຕໍ່ຄວາມສາມາດດ້ານວິຊາການຂອງບຸກຄະລາກອນໃນມະຫາວິທະຍາໄລແຫ່ງຊາດ. ໂດຍນຳໃຊ້ຂໍ້ມູນປະຖົມພູມທີ່ໄດ້ຈາກການເກັບກຳຂໍ້ມູນດ້ວຍແບບສອບຖາມຈາກບຸກຄະລາກອນພາຍໃນ 3 ຄະນະວິຊາ, ເຊິ່ງໃນຕົວຈິງສາມາດເກັບກຳຈຳນວນທັງໝົດໄດ້ 134 ຄົນ. ເຊິ່ງໄດ້ນຳໃຊ້ແບບຈຳລອງໂທບິດ (Tobit) ໃນການຄາດປະມານຫາຄ່າທີ່ສະແດງຜົນກະທົບຂອງປັດໄຈທີ່ມີຜົນຕໍ່ຄວາມສາມາດດ້ານວິຊາການ. ຈາກຜົນການສຶກສາພົບວ່າປັດໄຈທີ່ມີຜົນຕໍ່ຄວາມສາມາດດ້ານວິຊາການໃນດ້ານບວກປະກອບມີ ດ້ານງົບປະມານ ແລະ ການສຶກສາຢູ່ຕ່າງປະເທດ. ນອກຈາກນີ້ແລ້ວ, ຜົນການສຶກສາຍັງພົບອີກວ່າ ບຸກຄະລາກອນທີ່ມີວຸດທິການສຶກສາລະດັບປະລິນຍາເອກຈະມີຄວາມສາມາດດ້ານວິຊາການໃນການຂຽນເຮັດບົດຄົ້ນຄວ້າເພີ່ມຂື້ນ 3 ບົດ ແລະ ການເຂົ້າຮ່ວມເຜີຍແຜ່ຜົນການຄົ້ນຄວ້າໃນກອງປະຊຸມວິຊາການເພີ່ມຂື້ນ 4 ຄັ້ງເມືອນທຽບກັບບຸກຄະລາກອນທີ່ມີວຸດທິການສຶກສາລະດັບປະລິນຍາໂທ ແລະ ລະດັບປະລິນຍາຕີ. ສະນັ້ນ, ເພື່ອເປັນການສົ່ງເສີມໃຫ້ບຸກຄະລາກອນໃນມະຫາວິທະຍາໄລແຫ່ງຊາດມີຄວາມອາດສາມາດດ້ານວິຊາການເພີ່ມຂື້ນ. ທາງມະຫາວິທະຍາໄລຄວນສົ່ງເສີມໃຫ້ບຸກຄະລາກອນໄດ້ເຂົ້າເຖິງງົບປະມານໃນດ້ານວິຊາການໃຫ້ຫຼາຍຂື້ນ, ສົ່ງເສີມໃຫ້ໄດ້ໄປສຶກສາຢູ່ທີ່ຕ່າງປະເທດໃຫ້ຫຼາຍຂື້ນ ແລະ ໃຫ້ມີວຸດທິການສຶກສາລະດັບປະລິນຍາເອກຫຼາຍຂື້ນ. ຄຽງຄູ່ກັນນັ້ນບຸກຄະລາກອນກໍ່ຕ້ອງມີຄວາມບຸກບືນສູ້ຊົນໃນການພັດທະນາຕົນເອງໄປພ້ອມ, ເພື່ອປະກອບສ່ວນຜົນງານດ້ານວິຊາການໃຫ້ຫຼາຍຂື້ນທັງທາງດ້ານຄຸນນະພາບ ແລະ ປະລິນມານໃຫ້ທຽບເທົ່າສາກົນ.
References
Liu Y. and Hao Y. 2017. The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment : Evidence from China. Energy Policy 108 (February): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.055
Louzi B. M. and Abadi A. 2011. The impact of foreign direct investmenter on economic growth in jordan. International Journal of Research in Business Management 8 (August): 253–258.
Maddala G. S. and Wu S. 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (S1): 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631
Mah J. S. 2010. Foreign Direct Investment Inflows and Economic Growth: The Case of Korea. Review of Development Economics 14 (4): 726–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2010.00584.x
Mahadevan R. and Asafu-Adjaye J. 2007. Energy consumption, economic growth and prices: A reassessment using panel VECM for developed and developing countries. Energy Policy 35 (4): 2481–2490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.08.019
Markusen J. R. and Venables A. J. 1998. Multinational firms and the new trade theory, 46: 183–203.
Mert M., and Boluk G. 2016. Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23 (21): 21669–21681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7
N. Agarwal R. 2012. Economic Globalisation, Growth and the Environment: Testing of Environment Kuznet Curve Hypothesis for Malaysia. Journal of Business & Financial Affairs 01 (02): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0234.1000104
Nadeem A. M., Ali T., Khan M. T. I., and Guo Z. 2020. Relationship between inward FDI and environmental degradation for Pakistan : an exploration of pollution haven hypothesis through ARDL approach.
Narayan P. K. and Narayan S. 2010. Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38 (1): 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005
Ning L. and Wang F. 2017. Does FDI Bring Environmental Knowledge Spillovers to Developing Countries ? The Role of the Local Industrial Structure. Environmental and Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0159-y
Pazienza P. 2014. The Environmental Effects of FDI. In: The Relationship Between FDI and the Natural Environment. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04301-2_3
Pazienza P. 2015. The Environmental Impact of the FDI Inflow in the Transport Sector of OECD Countries and Policy Implications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-014-9511-y
Pedroni P. 2004. Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20 (03): 597–625. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0266466604203073
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
Rahman M. M. 2021. The dynamic nexus of energy consumption, international trade and economic growth in BRICS and ASEAN countries: A panel causality test. Energy 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120679
Sabir, S., Qayyum, U., & Majeed, T. (2020). FDI and environmental degradation: the role of political institutions in South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32544-32553.
Srithilat K., Sun G., Chanthanivong T., and Thavisay M. 2018. The Relationship between Inflation, Exchange Rate, and Currency Substitution: Evidence from Panel Vector Error Correction Model Approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8 (2): 79–84.
Wang Y., Chen L., and Kubota J. 2016. The relationship between urbanization, energy use and carbon emissions: Evidence from a panel of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 1368–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.041
Xaisongkham S., Phonasa S., Srithilat K., and Yuan H. 2019. Carbon dioxide emissions and the prospects for Lao PDR’s economic self-development. Human Systems Management, 38 (2): 111–123. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-18317
Xie Q. and Sun Q. 2020. Assessing the impact of FDI on PM2 . 5 concentrations: A nonlinear panel data analysis for emerging economies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 80 (September 2019): 106314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106314
Zaheer, Khan Kakar and Bashir A. K. 2011. Impact of FDI and Trade Openness on Economic Growth : A Comparative Study of Pakistan and Malaysia. Theoretical and Applied Economics XVIII (11): 53–58.
Zivot E. and Andrews D. W. K. 1992. Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10 (3): 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410372
